Annual labour value
Monthly hours × 12 × the actual hourly value of each role involved.
Automation ROI guide
A practical automation ROI model for converting recurring time, role value, errors, delays, and implementation costs into a defensible business decision.
The operational problem
Start with annual hours: time per occurrence multiplied by frequency. Then value each hour using the actual role performing it. Forty hours of owner time should not be valued like forty hours of entry-level administration.
Add avoidable errors, rework, delay, software duplication, and lost capacity where they can be supported. Subtract expected implementation cost, software usage, maintenance, training, and the portion of the process that still requires people.
A simple payback calculation is implementation cost divided by monthly net benefit. Use conservative assumptions and test the result after launch.
What improves
Monthly hours × 12 × the actual hourly value of each role involved.
Expected recurring value minus software, support, and remaining manual work.
Implementation cost divided by net monthly benefit, adjusted for rollout and risk.
Common opportunities
Every engagement begins with the real workflow—not a predetermined software product.
Our approach
Record time per occurrence, frequency, and every role involved.
Apply actual hourly values and defensible operational costs.
Subtract implementation, ongoing cost, risk, and remaining handling.
Measure the new process and update the business case with actual results.
Questions
Yes, when available. Wages alone understate employment cost. Keep the assumptions visible and separate from the base calculation.
Only if spending is actually avoided. Otherwise describe it as labour value or capacity returned, which is still valuable but economically different from a cash reduction.
It depends on risk and durability. A focused workflow with a clear payback inside a year is often easier to justify than a large speculative transformation.
Start with the work you already do